Can books fill the
news media’s gaps? 10/1/2007
The
senseless practice of media mobbing - 9/17/2007
Casualties of the Larry
Craig affair - 9/3/2007
My beef with
the media - 8/20/2007
Curbing
Murdoch - 8/6/2007
A little
story, easily overlooked - 7/23/2007
Can trickery
by reporters be right? - 7/9/2007
Journalism’s
coming war on privacy - 6/25/2007
All the news
that fits the plan - 6/11/2007
The new
world order comes to news - 5/28/2007
An ironic
curtain-raiser as Murdoch goes for the gold - 5/14/2007
On holding
back ugly realities - 4/30/2007
Why the
silence from our northern neighbor matters - 4/16/2007
The murky
world of conflicts of interest - 4/2/2007
‘If it’s OK
with you, I’m going to spoil your day…’ - 3/19/2007
When good
stories come from bad sources - 3/5/2007
The
vanishing art of standing firm - 2/19/2007
Flying high
with the Money Honey - 2/5/2007
Taking out
Saddam - 1/22/2007
The
insidious corruption of beats - 1/8/2007
2006
Columns
2005 Columns
2004 Columns
2003 Columns
|
A little
story, easily overlooked
By Edward Wasserman
Week of July
23, 2007
MANAUS, Brazil – Loredana Kotinski has the striking looks and easy charm
of the TV journalist she was for more than a decade. That was before she
moved into newspapers and before she came here to the capital of
Amazonas, a city of 1.5 million 900 miles up the world’s mightiest
river. At 34, she’s out of newsrooms now. She quit the region’s
principal daily after six years to run a gorgeous, high-gloss fashion
magazine.
The move frees her from relentless daily deadlines, and she hopes to
make tough-minded documentaries on her own time. At the newspaper, she
says over lunch, “You’re working in a system and you must work as the
system tells you, and because of that you’re very limited.”
What does the system demand? Coverage of crime, politics, politicians
and entertainment.
And the Amazonian environment? Coverage is scant, to her dismay. Goaded
by the foreign media focus on ecological peril, Brazilian journalists
agree attention must be paid. But in general, Kotinski says: “People
want to see only the forest, the animals, the monkeys – as if it’s a big
zoo.”
I thought of Kotinski two days later and six hours up the Rio Negro,
which winds southeasterly from Colombia to where it joins the Amazon at
Manaus. Our group of U.S. and Brazilian researchers and students – under
a program funded by Petrobras, Brazil’s national oil company -- had
docked at a tiny village.
There we met Waldemiro Silva, leader of this settlement of Kambeba, or
Omagua, Indians, once a major tribe, now nearly extinct.
Silva is a sturdy 48, perhaps 5-foot-3, with deep brown, unlined skin
and a woven headband that pushes his straight black hair back so
severely his head seems almost pointed. (Later, a colleague shows me a
sketch made by Europeans in the 1780s showing a Kambeban wearing a
nearly identical headpiece.) Silva, in T-shirt and shorts, leads us
through the forest, showing crops, fish farm and medicinal plants – he
is the village’s chief custodian of traditional healing arts.
His people are not from here. Until the 1970s they lived far to the west
where the soil is richer and the river is “whitewater” -- laced with
nutrients and teeming with more life than the anemic, blackwater area we
were visiting. But they had to leave. They were routinely cheated by
middlemen in attempting to sell into the cash economy, and they were
being ravaged by “white man’s diseases” such as pneumonia and
tuberculosis.
So, in 1971, their journey began. From the intermittent translations as
we cluster beneath a thatched shelter under the broiling equatorial sun,
I gather that some Kambeba initially resettled way north on the Rio
Negro near Venezuela, hundreds of miles from their homelands. Silva
followed his father-in-law there.
After a time the elder fell ill and sought care in Manaus, where he was
hospitalized. The three generations tried to make a go of it in the
capital, but Silva’s beloved four-year-old daughter got sick and died.
He meanwhile was selling ice cream on the streets of the grimy port
city. “I’m an Indian,” he says. “This is not what I want to do.”
As fortune had it, relatives of his wife had been living at the place
that was to become his new home, and one day a cousin arrived in Manaus.
His brother had been killed by a falling tree, and the man could no
longer bear to live there. Silva, bereaved by his daughter’s death,
could no longer bear to live in Manaus, so in November 1991, he traveled
upriver with his wife and five children to this then-uninhabited spot.
They began clearing the riverbank, huddling around the fire at night for
fear of jaguars, and he built a home for his family and his people.
His father-in-law visited from Manaus, liked what he saw, and convinced
a second family to join them. Others followed. Sixteen years later the
settlement has 15 families totaling 68 people, nearly a third 15 or
younger.
The village, Aldeia Tres Unidos, has an artesian well and clean water.
It benefits modestly from government aid to Indians, a fragile sliver of
a once-vast Amazonian populace decimated in one of history’s most
horrific genocides. One of Silva’s sons teaches 28 primary students,
smiling and evidently well-fed, in a one-room schoolhouse. Another helps
run a clinic; health services reassured non-indigenous neighbors the
Indians wouldn’t eat them.
Its footings are precarious, but the village abides. And Waldemiro
Silva’s tale is the sort of narrative of hardship, loss, determination
and vision that strikes responsive chords deep within the foundational
myths of our own culture.
Yet nobody tells his story. The most powerful story-telling mechanisms
ever devised are busy propagating other myths, of beauty and
self-absorption, celebrities and super-models. Courage and survival will
have to wait. |