Last Updated: 02/11/2005 

News


Sports


In depth


Discussion Forum


Past Editions


The Rockbridge Report is produced under the supervision of the Dept. of Journalism and Mass Communications at Washington and Lee University.
540-458-8432
540-458-8845 Fax

rreport@wlu.edu

Lead supervisor:
Prof. Claudette Artwick

 

Reporting supervisors:                  Prof. Doug Cumming

Prof. Bob de Maria

 

Technical supervisor:

Michael Todd 

 

How the budget hits home

Farm Subsidies:                                          

Video:  Professor John Gunn, Lewis Whitaker Adams Professor Emeritus of Economics at W&L, explains why eliminating subsidies might not be a bad thing.

 

 

Video:  Margaret Ann Smith, a farmer whose family owns 8,000 acres of farmland in Rockbridge County, explains which farmers would be affected by the change in subsidies.

  • President Bush proposed limiting the farm subsidies to $250,000
  • The current limit is $360,000.
  • The Bush proposal would be a 30% cut in the subsidies which would equal a $587 million reduction in the U.S. budget.
  • The farm subsidies are not allocated on the basis of income, but rather on the type of crops produced.
  • Grain, cotton, soybeans, rice and corn are the top most subsidized crops.
  • 2/3 of the USDA subsidies go to 10% of the farmers. Those are usually big farming corporations and partnerships. The small family farms receive just a small percentage of the state aid.
  • A small percent of the farmers will be affected.
  • Additional farm subsidy data

Education Cuts:                                         

Budget would shake up federal school funds

By Lisa Baratta

President Bush’s proposed budget for federal education aid would eliminate at least two programs in Rockbridge County, but would add funding for the No Child Left Behind Act at the high school.

Most of the county’s education budget comes from state and local governments, but federal grants are especially important for programs for underprivileged and special needs students. Bush’s proposed budget for next year would reduce federal assistance by one percent and eliminate many programs.

The federal government often passes down mandates without adequate funding, said Vice Chairman of the Lexington School Board Marilyn Alexander. Lexington runs its own elementary and middle school but shares the high school with the county.

Alexander said that the states have to take up the slack. A key example is Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act, which uses student test scores to evaluate school performance. Bush is now proposing to expand this testing into the high school level, but he wants to provide more funding to help schools succeed with these tests.

The increased funding would be through Title I, a federal program for schools with low-income students. Title I funding for Rockbridge County Schools -- currently from $425,000 to $450,000 -- would get a 4.7 percent increase under Bush’s plans.

But funding would be eliminated at Rockbridge County High School for two programs, Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Talent Search.

Talent Search is a program that helps first-generation college-bound students with tutoring and counseling. All that the student is required to provide is the motivation, said Talent Search counselor Jennifer Balkey.

She said eliminating the program would be "terrible" and have significant implications in the Rockbridge community. "If they cut it, a lot of students will suffer," said Balkey.

The local Talent Search program is sponsored by Dabney S. Lancaster Community College. It serves a wide area including Allegany and Botetourt counties but Balkey said that the majority of those in need are in Rockbridge, where their office is located.

Alexander said that this area has a lot of local students who are part of the first-generation of their family to go to college or are at risk students.

Alexander was also unhappy with the proposed elimination of the Safe and Drug-Free Schools program. "To not have programs that reinforce drug-free standards would be very crucial – not just for this area but for the whole country."

"If they [these programs] are being cut because of lack of amount of success, why not take a look and see where improvements can be made because there are people who can benefit," said Alexander. She urges people to contact their legislators concerning these proposed cuts.

 
Bush's Proposed Budget:  Federal Education Funding Changes
  Current Proposed Percent Change
Title I $427,005 $447,074 4.70%
Safe & Drug Free Schools $17,626 $0.00 -100%

Let the battle of the budget begin

Treasury Secretary John Snow defends President Bush's FY 2006 budget before the Senate Finance Committee on Capitol Hill Tuesday.   (AP Photo)

By Kaela Harmon

President Bush and the GOP announced the 2006 budget plan on Monday which has caused quite a stir in Congress. As part of his proposal Bush has requested increasing funding for defense and domestic security while scaling back on spending for Medicaid, eliminating or deeply cutting more than 150 education programs and reducing farming subsidies.

The Associated Press cited a liberal think tank as saying that the new budget will leave deep cuts to environmental protection, community development, veterans benefits and other programs through the end of the decade. The GOP is rallying support for the budget with House Budget Committee Chairman Jim Nussle, R-Iowa, saying "Don't claim you want to cut the deficit in one breath and demand we spend more in the next.''

According to the AP, Bush's budget chief, Joshua Bolten, said that the President "won't hesitate'' to veto excessive spending bills but the hope is that it will not come to that. In the meantime there will be a lot of discussion in Congress regarding next year's budget.

Story compiled using AP wires.